Originally Posted by wieder
That is an impressive read.
Yep indeed. Their whole entire case boils down to this: They agreed to pay back that advance if the game wasn't delivered by October 2012 therefore they should pay it all back NOW. Sorry but it is demonstratably NOT October 2012 now. If the legal system allows them to make that claim successfully then the legal system is moronic but more importantly HIGHLY unethical.
Also you CANNOT violate a conditional obligation when the condition is not met. I am talking here about the delivery of the Master. That is only an obligation if the Master is done, which it is NOT.
So this proves that Take Two from an ethical(not to be confused with a legal) point of view is TOTALLY, UTTERLY and ONLY in the WRONG.