Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien_Azreal
Not really. There wasn't anything done in DX10 that couldn't have been done in DX9.
|
Amazing how someon like Carmack was so wrong if he actually said that.
But I'm skeptical that he actually said DX9 could do everything DX10 could - that's just ignorant. Perhaps it's his interest clouding his honesty.
SM3 proved we didn't need DX10, but there is plenty it "can" do that DX9 cannot.
Quote:
I don't know if he's made any comments about DX11 yet. But I remember him saying it was a gimmick to get people to buy Vista. As there were no real benefits.
|
As far as a gimmick to buy the next version DirectX capable hardware.....
SHOCKING
(emphasis for sarcasm)