Forum Archive

Go Back   3D Realms Forums > 3D Realms Topics > Duke Nukem > Duke Nukem Forever
Blogs FAQ Community Calendar

Notices

View Poll Results: Is the situation Take-Two's fault?
Yes 26 39.39%
No 40 60.61%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-11-2010, 02:30 PM   #1
ultra tree 85!

ultra tree 85!'s Avatar
Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Hi, I've come to the conclusion that Take-Two's hostility and greed is the reason that 3D Realms wasn't able to just finish DNF on their planned internal schedule, which would have put DNF out next month. As everyone can see in the legal documentation, Take-Two visited 3DR several times and told the company that they were pleased with how things were going. Then, in late 2008, negotiations for funding to handle the internal development of multiplayer and the xbox 360 version, as well as pushing the game to release in general began. 3D Realms was verbally promised six million dollars initially, and so they dedicated funding and resources to the development of the xbox 360 and multiplayer components, which they wouldn't have done if they hadn't thought financial support was coming. As a direct result of Take-Two's lies and hostile false promises, 3D Realms was forced to fire its internal staff when Take-Two refused to provide the funding. Had they provided said funding, we'd all be preparing to play DNF as we speak, and 3D realms would still be fully operational.

Take-Two is a horrendous company anyway, and the games that they create aren't worth even looking at. GTA 4 was so stupid that I played for 30 minutes, got sick of it, and never put it into my 360 again. 3D Realms deserves better than this, and I would welcome the day that 3D Realms gets out of the contract and finds a better company to publish the game. I don't want to see the sickening Take-Two logo on the DNF box, anyway.

So, what's your opinion on this issue? Should the publisher be blamed?
__________________
Duke Nukem Forever will be released in 2010. The community will realize its dream of playing the greatest game of all time. :)
Last edited by ultra tree 85!; 03-11-2010 at 02:33 PM.
ultra tree 85! is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 02:43 PM   #2
Boosh

Boosh's Avatar
Hhg Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Boosh is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 03:26 PM   #3
Duke's New Chainsaw

Duke's New Chainsaw's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Someone take the "Post New Topic" button away from this guy.
__________________
The Great Communicator!
Duke's New Chainsaw is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 03:36 PM   #4
crunchy superman

crunchy superman's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
I miss Joe.
__________________

crunchy superman is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 03:44 PM   #5
ultra tree 85!

ultra tree 85!'s Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke's New Chainsaw View Post
Someone take the "Post New Topic" button away from this guy.
Why? I'm just trying to ask the community important questions and bring everyone together for discussion on the relevant issues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by crunchy superman View Post
I miss Joe.
So, what's your opinon about who is at fault?
__________________
Duke Nukem Forever will be released in 2010. The community will realize its dream of playing the greatest game of all time. :)
ultra tree 85! is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 03:52 PM   #6
crunchy superman

crunchy superman's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
So, what's your opinon about who is at fault?
1) We've not been given enough information by either party to make such a judgment.

2) Nothing we could do about it if we had been.

3) We still wouldn't be playing the game in any case.

4) . . . profit?
__________________

crunchy superman is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 04:52 PM   #7
KO Gilligan

KO Gilligan's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
in the

SITUATION ROOM

KO Gilligan is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 04:56 PM   #8
someguy2435

someguy2435's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
__________________
Things go here. Rabble rabble.
someguy2435 is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 04:57 PM   #9
TBZ

TBZ's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
So, what's your opinon about who is at fault?
I'd say it's pretty obvious it's your fault.
__________________
After a year in therapy, my psychiatrist said to me, 'Maybe life isn't for everyone.'
TBZ is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 04:58 PM   #10
Duke's New Chainsaw

Duke's New Chainsaw's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
Why? I'm just trying to ask the community important questions and bring everyone together for discussion on the relevant issues.
Er... no. You are regurgitating the same bullshit that's been said in other threads.
__________________
The Great Communicator!
Duke's New Chainsaw is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 04:58 PM   #11
The Stinger
Guest
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBZ View Post
I'd say it's pretty obvious it's your fault.
Listen to this man! He speaks the truth!
 
Old 03-11-2010, 05:04 PM   #12
Rapture_Rising

Rapture_Rising's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
ITS 3DR's FAULT.

If 3DR didnt take 12 [insert swear here] years to develop one [insert swear here] game then they wouldnt be in this mess.
__________________
Here we go folks... The rarest creature in nature... The Duketard. I will now approach him very quitely and... Jam my thumb in his butt hole. That should REALLY piss him off!.
Rapture_Rising is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:05 PM   #13
Duke's New Chainsaw

Duke's New Chainsaw's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
__________________
The Great Communicator!
Duke's New Chainsaw is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:07 PM   #14
The Stinger
Guest
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapture_Rising View Post
ITS 3DR's FAULT.

If 3DR didnt take 12 poopie years to develop one poopie game then they wouldnt be in this mess.
 
Old 03-11-2010, 05:11 PM   #15
MrBohica

MrBohica's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
Why? I'm just trying to ask the community important questions
Kid, look. These questions you're posting aren't important in the least, because in the end, it's not going to matter who WE THINK is at fault.
These useless poll threads you're making are doing nothing but inducing rage and taking up space that could better be used otherwise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85!
GTA 4 was so stupid that I played for 30 minutes, got sick of it, and never put it into my 360 again.
Don't get me started on how short an attention span you must have for only playing it for 30 minutes and deeming it "stupid".

Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85!
3D Realms deserves better than this, and I would welcome the day that 3D Realms gets out of the contract and finds a better company to publish the game.
This is a freaking two way street, kid. It was in no way shape or form 100% 3DR's or T2's fault. A 13 year delay was 3DR's demise, and T2 just snapped, and I honestly don't blame them.

By the by, don't kid yourself. An April release date wasn't going to happen, no matter who said it.
__________________
"DNF had a development cycle?"
"Yup - the spin cycle"
MrBohica is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:14 PM   #16
JobivanHiob

JobivanHiob's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
its Take 2 fault due to the reasons you mentioned!

Its true that 3DR needed a tremendous time to get to the final version of DNF. But they had the right to do so! Take 2 just got unpatient with them and also wanted to grab the Duke IP, so they sued them even with only 1 % chance of winning the case! But as 3DR already said Take 2 is basing their suit on nothing but wishful thinking!
They just thought, hey lets sue these guys we are the big publisher they are just a small studio! Take 2 just sued 3DR because they could! And this is a problem of the us-legal system!
And let me say this, Take 2 would be very stupid to let the case go on for another 1 or 2 years! Because in the end they won't get either the Duke IP and maybe neither the chance to publish a state of the art DNF!

I just hope that Take 2 brings this stupid lawsuit to an end in the very near future! But I also know of some "banksters" that invest in the weak € to profit from it and in the end will bring the financial system to a crash harming themselfs by this irrepealable! Not even mentioning the world financial crisis in the 1929!

Take 2 don't be stupid! Release DNF!

__________________
Stay up to date with http://dukewatch.blogspot.com for the UNEXPECTED and PREPARE YOURSELF for SHOCK and AWESOME on Penny Arcade EXPO from September 3-5!
Onebullit: "If DNF comes out in 2010 i will buy 2 copies and send you one."
pjVgt regading DNF at PAX:"I would seriously shit my pants and pre-order three copies - one will be sent to Jobi"
Last edited by JobivanHiob; 03-11-2010 at 05:17 PM.
JobivanHiob is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:17 PM   #17
Conan of Cooma
 
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Take 2 tried to finish and release DNF, 3DR blocked them.

Don't be an ass clown.

This is 3DR fault.
Conan of Cooma is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:22 PM   #18
MrBohica

MrBohica's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Conan of Cooma View Post
Take 2 tried to finish and release DNF, 3DR blocked them.

Don't be an ass clown.

This is 3DR fault.
What he said.
__________________
"DNF had a development cycle?"
"Yup - the spin cycle"
MrBohica is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:23 PM   #19
vitaminr
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
GTA 4 was so stupid that I played for 30 minutes, got sick of it, and never put it into my 360 again.

Also, implying a distributor of all things creates games, even a publisher has more to do with it than that.
vitaminr is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:25 PM   #20
Damien_Azreal
Super Moderator

Damien_Azreal's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Is the situation Take2's fault? Hmm.... who do we blame here.

The publisher, who just had a distribution contract to release the game.... or the developer that did not deliver the game so the publisher could release it.

Wow. That's a tough one.
__________________
Monolith Fanboy since 1997

Upcoming Anticipated Games: Doom, Shadow Warrior 2, Mafia III, DisHonored 2, Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
Damien_Azreal is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:26 PM   #21
JobivanHiob

JobivanHiob's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
LOL Conan!

Of course Take 2 wanted DNF to be released some years before! But you know what, it wouldn't have been the game you would expected from 3DR!
The last versions of DNF weren't the quality level you would expect from 3DR!

Only the last incarnation from around beginning of 2007 until now is what you expect a sequel of famous DN3D! One can argue if the time from 1997 to 2006 was worth spend of course!
But I say despite 3DR wasted some months of develoment time, the 10 years were needed to get to the point they were in May 2009 and most certainly are now with the game!
__________________
Stay up to date with http://dukewatch.blogspot.com for the UNEXPECTED and PREPARE YOURSELF for SHOCK and AWESOME on Penny Arcade EXPO from September 3-5!
Onebullit: "If DNF comes out in 2010 i will buy 2 copies and send you one."
pjVgt regading DNF at PAX:"I would seriously shit my pants and pre-order three copies - one will be sent to Jobi"
JobivanHiob is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:30 PM   #22
MrBohica

MrBohica's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobivanHiob View Post
Of course Take 2 wanted DNF to be released some years before! But you know what, it wouldn't have been the game you would expected from 3DR!
Oh hey! And guess what!?
With 13 years of production, 3DR still has nothing to show for it but a couple teaser trailers with some shiny pictures. Sure they made the Duke franchise that captivated gamers for years, but honestly, they're nothing as of right now compared to larger companies.
__________________
"DNF had a development cycle?"
"Yup - the spin cycle"
MrBohica is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:40 PM   #23
Eagle

Eagle's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
The guilt rests solely on george for taking so long. His addiction to drugs supports crime and even terrorism.
Last edited by Eagle; 03-12-2010 at 03:02 AM.
Eagle is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:48 PM   #24
JobivanHiob

JobivanHiob's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
MrBohica the good comes to those who wait!

I would love to see a trailer too, but right now they can't release any media due to the suit!
But I appreciate that Scott and George are of the oppinion that too much media can kill the hype! 1-2 proper trailers, a few gameplay clips, a few screenshots and some more info in game magazines will be enough before the release!

wow I can't remember when I last talked about releasing media for DNF!
__________________
Stay up to date with http://dukewatch.blogspot.com for the UNEXPECTED and PREPARE YOURSELF for SHOCK and AWESOME on Penny Arcade EXPO from September 3-5!
Onebullit: "If DNF comes out in 2010 i will buy 2 copies and send you one."
pjVgt regading DNF at PAX:"I would seriously shit my pants and pre-order three copies - one will be sent to Jobi"
JobivanHiob is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:53 PM   #25
MrBohica

MrBohica's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobivanHiob View Post
MrBohica the good comes to those who wait!
Then be prepared to wait another decade---end of your life. It's not happening anytime soon.
__________________
"DNF had a development cycle?"
"Yup - the spin cycle"
MrBohica is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 05:59 PM   #26
ultra tree 85!

ultra tree 85!'s Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle View Post
The guilt rests solely on george for taking so long.
What about Take-Two's hostile attempt to take the Duke IP and deny 3D Realms the agreed funding?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle View Post
I heard from the dallas sex industry that he is addicted to cocaine
That was just a joke that he made during the Jace Hall interview, he wasn't being serious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle View Post
this should be punishable with the death sentence.
The death sentence is utterly inhumane and barbaric, and no modern nation has any excuse to ever engage in this practice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle View Post
His addiction to drugs supports crime and even terrorism.
That makes no sense whatsoever.
__________________
Duke Nukem Forever will be released in 2010. The community will realize its dream of playing the greatest game of all time. :)
ultra tree 85! is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:03 PM   #27
TBZ

TBZ's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
That makes no sense whatsoever.
Now you know how we feel every time you make a new thread.
__________________
After a year in therapy, my psychiatrist said to me, 'Maybe life isn't for everyone.'
TBZ is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 06:10 PM   #28
Duke's New Chainsaw

Duke's New Chainsaw's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobivanHiob View Post
But you know what, it wouldn't have been the game you would expected from 3DR!


But I say despite 3DR wasted some months of develoment time, the 10 years were needed to get to the point they were in May 2009 and most certainly are now with the game!

JobivanHyberbole
__________________
The Great Communicator!
Duke's New Chainsaw is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 07:59 PM   #29
fast-1

fast-1's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
I rock the vote to say loadsofmoney.
fast-1 is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 08:06 PM   #30
GrimWoman

GrimWoman's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Take2 and 3DR are both at fault, 3DR took forever, Take2 made it take longer.
GrimWoman is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 08:16 PM   #31
Bam050196

Bam050196's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
I agree with ReaperMan.
Bam050196 is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 08:17 PM   #32
Scotty

Scotty's Avatar
Arrow Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
Hi, I've come to the conclusion that Take-Two's hostility and greed is the reason that 3D Realms wasn't able to just finish DNF on their planned internal schedule, which would have put DNF out next month. As everyone can see in the legal documentation, Take-Two visited 3DR several times and told the company that they were pleased with how things were going. Then, in late 2008, negotiations for funding to handle the internal development of multiplayer and the xbox 360 version, as well as pushing the game to release in general began. 3D Realms was verbally promised six million dollars initially, and so they dedicated funding and resources to the development of the xbox 360 and multiplayer components, which they wouldn't have done if they hadn't thought financial support was coming. As a direct result of Take-Two's lies and hostile false promises, 3D Realms was forced to fire its internal staff when Take-Two refused to provide the funding. Had they provided said funding, we'd all be preparing to play DNF as we speak, and 3D realms would still be fully operational.
If TTWO didn't offer the $6M in the first place, what would have been the outcome?

Given that 12 years and $20M (rumored) have gone by already, is it reasonable to assume that 3DR would've somehow completed the PC version of DNF before cash ran out if the XBox diversion had never occurred?
Scotty is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 09:08 PM   #33
Eagle

Eagle's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
g and s could of squeezed 5 mil from their personal assets to finish dnf but instead they approached t2 for it and when t2 declined they shut down the shop, they had someone else to blame for their failure of dnf...thats all they needed to can the whole project, a scapegoat. If they really wanted to finish it they could of pulled it off. the most probable truth is that 5 mil was not enough to finish it and they were really after a scapegoat to take the hit. g and s were quick to fire everyone and close it down without even considering selling off their personal assets. dnf was killed with a self inflicting wound after they realized they did not have the ground breaking content that the communitie was expecting. did you see any interactivity at all in any of the leaked footage? they did not have a revolutionary game, they had a mediocre half finished game and they killed it before it was exposed.
Eagle is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 09:11 PM   #34
Conan of Cooma
 
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Somebody shoot me now!
Conan of Cooma is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 09:30 PM   #35
GrimWoman

GrimWoman's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by conan of cooma View Post
somebody shoot me now!
Bang!!!
GrimWoman is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 10:00 PM   #36
MrBohica

MrBohica's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
What about Take-Two's hostile attempt to take the Duke IP and deny 3D Realms the agreed funding?
What about the 13 year delay? Put it in perspective, T2 is honestly the only company EVER that would EVER in their RIGHT MIND back a company for so long with no product. T2 has every right in the book to be hostile and angry with 3DR, and if you deny it, then you're blinded by your own ignorance.
__________________
"DNF had a development cycle?"
"Yup - the spin cycle"
MrBohica is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 10:06 PM   #37
ultra tree 85!

ultra tree 85!'s Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBohica View Post
What about the 13 year delay? Put it in perspective, T2 is honestly the only company EVER that would EVER in their RIGHT MIND back a company for so long with no product. T2 has every right in the book to be hostile and angry with 3DR, and if you deny it, then you're blinded by your own ignorance.
I disagree fundamentally with what you're saying. There is no justification for malicious, misleading activity during business negotiations. There also wasn't any justification for a lawsuit in this case, either. Some people believe that 3D Realms in some way violated the contract themselves, providing justification for legal action against them after the collapse. However, that couldn't be further from the truth. 3D Realms was not required to complete the game within any amount of time, and they were free to pursue their own schedule due to the fact that it was funded internally. They owe Take-Two nothing, and I don't know why everyone here seems to think that they do. The contract includes nothing on the subject of deadlines, and Take-Two's "implied deadline" argument in their legal filings is the most absurd thing I've ever heard in my life.
__________________
Duke Nukem Forever will be released in 2010. The community will realize its dream of playing the greatest game of all time. :)
ultra tree 85! is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 10:13 PM   #38
MrBohica

MrBohica's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
3D Realms was not required to complete the game within any amount of time, and they were free to pursue their own schedule due to the fact that it was funded internally.
And yet you're still going to complain that T2 backed out of funding and was royally pissed? They were given more than a decade, so I'm not sure why you're getting butt-hurt at T2.

THIRTEEN YEEEARS.

Okay so it's a two-way street. Both are at fault. But I don't understand why you're all like
"HERPDERP T2 SCREWED IT UP, THEY SHOULD HAVE GIVEN THEM 7 MORE YEARS, THEN WE'D HAVE DNF"
That's not how it happens. Like I said, T2 is the only company that would stick through for so long to see a final product, and if they found 13 years too long, then so be it.
__________________
"DNF had a development cycle?"
"Yup - the spin cycle"
MrBohica is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 10:16 PM   #39
ultra tree 85!

ultra tree 85!'s Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBohica View Post
And yet you're still going to complain that T2 backed out of funding and was royally pissed? They were given more than a decade, so I'm not sure why you're getting butt-hurt at T2.

THIRTEEN YEEEARS.

Okay so it's a two-way street. Both are at fault. But I don't understand why you're all like
"HERPDERP T2 SCREWED IT UP, THEY SHOULD HAVE GIVEN THEM 7 MORE YEARS, THEN WE'D HAVE DNF"
That's not how it happens. Like I said, T2 is the only company that would stick through for so long to see a final product, and if they found 13 years too long, then so be it.
3D Realms needed only one more year to finish the game, and Take-Two knew it. They also knew that 3D Realms was running low on funds, so they took advantage of them, mislead the company, and tried to take everything that they'd worked for. They planned to take the nearly completed game and release it for themselves when they could have just given 3D Realms one more years' funding.
__________________
Duke Nukem Forever will be released in 2010. The community will realize its dream of playing the greatest game of all time. :)
ultra tree 85! is offline  
Old 03-11-2010, 10:24 PM   #40
MrBohica

MrBohica's Avatar
Re: Is the situation Take-Two's Fault?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultra tree 85! View Post
3D Realms needed only one more year to finish the game, and Take-Two knew it.
Oh.
My.
God.
Open your eyes.
How many times have we been told that they "Guys, we only need [Insert REALISTIC TIME here], don't even worry about it."
This "1 more year" bullcrap is nothing new.
__________________
"DNF had a development cycle?"
"Yup - the spin cycle"
MrBohica is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Page generated in 0.21130300 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 17 queries

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Website is ©1987-2014 Apogee Software, Ltd.
Ideas and messages posted here become property of Apogee Software Ltd.